stop laughing and type
After the physics joke debacle at work, I know better than to try to circulate this one. You guys, though, probably have the right combination of cultural literacy and sheer geekiness to appreciate the following.
Read at severe risk of snarfing
Read at severe risk of snarfing
BTW..
Education does not always equal appreciation. As much as I enjoy major sections of the classics, some of it is just a real bore.
But then I also commented to some artist friends on another list after a recent trip to Paris where I saw Picasso just how bored most of his work makes me. Such a philistine... at least I've got the blood to prove it!
I am surprised to note that I don't seem to have any Joyce in my grandfather's gold leaf collection of Harvard Classics.
Re: BTW..
Re: BTW..
It certainly doesn't mean that they're required to actually be good literature, eh?
Well, quality is subjective, and the fact that they've lasted and been influential is enough for some to qualify them.
I'm a bit off the beaten path here. *wry smile*
Re: BTW..
Quality is definitely subjective. It's interesting to read some of the so-called-classics. I started reading (or re-reading in some cases) Jules Vergne, Wells, and other SF "classics" awhile back, too. Readability is all over the map ... Some of them still hold up and are really good reads. Some of them, at least to my more modern sensibilities are much harder to read, harder to follow the storylines, etc.
But they did influence modern Science Fiction (and other literature), so it's kind of fun to get the background, as it were. Also to see where some of those horrid 50's B SF movies got their ideas from ... <g>