madbaker: (KOL)
I enjoy drinking coffee. After a brief period as an undergrad of habitually overdosing and then going cold turkey over the summer to counteract, I conceded the psychological addiction but limit my intake to prevent a physical one - I don't like getting a caffeine headache if I don't drink it. What that means in practice is that during the week, I have a single cup of coffee before I leave for work. Approximately once per week if I am really lagging, I allow myself a second cup after I get in to the office.

Our building, in its attempts to retain and attract tenants in a depressed office market, has been updating the 100+-year-old building slightly. The latest amenity is a new lounge on our floor with couches, a couple tables, a microwave... and a free coffee machine.

Part of the way I enforce my limit is that I have to go out of the building and buy a second cup of coffee. It's just enough inconvenience that I have to feel like I want/need to do it rather than just being available. So... I am going to pretend that this free coffee machine doesn't exist.

NERD

Nov. 6th, 2024 09:24 am
madbaker: (Bayeux cook)
A friend: "Was the Norman Conquest a result of the Y1K crisis?"

Me: "...No, but Cnut's was."

I mean, William the Bastard is 1066, hardly the turn of the century! And while math says that the millennium actually started 1001, the popular misconception coincides much better with Cnut's conquest in 1016.
madbaker: (oxford comma)
There's a line in Much Ado About Nothing that bugs the heck out of me in rehearsal (admittedly more than the issue warrants):
URSULA: She's lim'd, I warrant you!
The actress reads it as "limmed", which is an understandable interpretation. It is, however, wrong.

The word is "limed", and it refers to Beatrice being "caught" in their plot -- small birds were often caught by spreading quicklime; their feet would get stuck when they landed, so they couldn't fly away.  I mentioned this to the actress at a previous rehearsal, she acknowledged it, and yesterday she was back to saying "limmed".

I'm pretty sure I'm losing this one, if only because I'm the only one who cares (and I am not the director).  It is totally a minor thing, but it's going to grate on my ears every time.  Because I understand the line and its context, and this reading doesn't.
madbaker: (Paul the Samurai)
I'm stealing the format from the last milestone I commemorated, #800 back in 2019.
Cut for navel-gazing )

Finally, this week's Resolution Recipe: Plum and Walnut Pie.
"Plums and walnuts work beautifully together, with a little cinnamon and butter to distract from the sharpness of the fruit."
Read more... )
madbaker: (oxford comma)
I recently read a fantasy apocalypse book - monsters appear and the world breaks down. While there are fortified safe zones, generally it takes hours to go a few miles because travel is on foot and you have to look out for and/or fight monsters the whole time.

The main character is in Hollywood, and at the end of the book all he wants to do is get to his family - who are on the East Coast.

Let me break this down. Character is planning to walk, in a group of three to five people, from southern CA to the East Coast. While fighting monsters the whole time. Not to mention having to traverse the desert and salt flats (I was initially yelling about the Rocky Mountains, but that's a N CA reflex). How many months or years will this take? How are you planning to carry supplies with only a few people and no wagons? Do you know how much drinking water weighs?

I guess the author never played Oregon Trail.
madbaker: (oxford comma)
We got a gourmet chocolate advent calendar from Dandelion Chocolate. The wife really wanted to try it, so I agreed. A couple days in I started rating them, and set up a quick Google Sheet, because of course I did. Here are the results and some quick thoughts around that.

My half-assed scale was 1 to 4 cocoa beans. 1 = bad; 2 = meh; 3 = tasty; 4 = mouthgasm. (I did end up giving half ratings, e.g. 3.5 = tasty-plus but not mouthgasm).

The average was 3.1. I never gave any 1s, and I frankly would have been shocked if any had deserved that because if nothing else, Dandelion makes very good chocolate. More than I would have liked were "meh" or "okay" which was what I gave a 2.5. For the price point, none of them should have been below 3 and eight of the 25 were!

The packaging was very good but kind of a waste, because it's going in the recycling bin. Some of the products we may look for on their own but I doubt I'll put a huge effort into it. So, summary: not worth the gourmet cost overall, would not get again.
madbaker: (oxford comma)
The upstairs neighbors returned from a socially-distanced visit with friends, bearing large numbers of juicy Seville oranges. So I made marmalade. But... I was slightly over-ambitious because they had about 10 kg. I started with 4 kg, I think? Fortunately or un-, I have a very large maslin pan (9.5 quart capacity) capable of jamming this amount.

It took several days to cook and set, but I potted them up after work yesterday. Final count: 13 pints in 21 jars. Also, I am out of canning jars. Except for 4 oz jelly jars, which I tend not to use for jam unless I am making gifts.

However, I really shouldn't get any more. According to my jam inventory spreadsheet* I have 81 jars of various sizes in storage, and with us not eating jam that quickly - I really need to not make any more jam this year.

*Yes, I have a jam inventory spreadsheet. Besides satisfying my not-OCD, it has a useful purpose in telling me what varieties of jam are over-represented in storage. That allows me to give away and/or eat through the jars more efficiently. Apricot, plum, and now marmalade are the three biggest holdings right now.

Routines

Jan. 18th, 2021 08:51 am
madbaker: (Chef!)
Quite a few years ago, we realized the way had been doing dinners was flawed. Having lots of ingredients on hand so you can whip up whatever you feel like is great, but it requires inspiration and sometimes planning. Too often we fell into "It's 6 PM, I don't know what I want to have, let's get Chinese food."

So we started weekly meal planning. Near the end of the week we make up a shopping list, and most of the time involves plotting out the coming week's meals. I get bored very quickly if all the meals are similar ("meat and salad" can only happen a couple times in any given week, even if the meats are different like fish and chicken). I also try to look at the calendar and think through the week to see how much work I am willing to do. When I was Kingdom Exchequer (drink!) many more of the meals were simple and/or "the wife puts most of this together" because I didn't have much spare time or bandwidth.

I don't plot out when most of those meals will happen. We typically decide the night before. That allows the wife, who likes more spontaneity, to make changes on the fly. But it's also not locked in - last night I suggested we postpone today's meal because it would create lots of leftovers, and we already have several lunches' worth in the fridge. Instead I'm making a salad with leftover beefsteak. It's important to allow for changes when a meal that sounded good the previous Friday just doesn't appeal... we had onion soup on the list for two successive weeks before taking it off the dinner plan for now.

Not triggered by anything in particular. It's worked well for us for probably 20 years.
madbaker: (Paul the Samurai)
Yesterday I baked a no-knead yeast loaf and a no-knead sourdough loaf so we could compare side by side. It wasn't a perfect test; the proportions were slightly larger in the yeast loaf when I cut the sourdough batch in half. Ideally I would have mathed it to be equal, but I couldn't be arsed.

I also kept the sourdough batch in the fridge for an extra day to see if that developed more flavor. The answer is: not really. I'm not sure it added anything. The yeast loaf rose more and has a more open crumb - as would be expected. Both have a nice chewy texture as is standard for the no-knead recipes.

I'll probably make $4 toast or a basic loaf when I want sourdough, and keep the dry yeast no-knead loaf as an alternate when I feel like it.
madbaker: (Paul the Samurai)
I went back to the dry yeast no-knead loaf recipe today. Half strong white flour, half local coarse wheat. Thing One had an additional one cup walnuts kneaded in.

The loaves are nearly identical with a good rise and round shape, if not high and fluffy. Soft texture and open interior crumb. Thing One is a bit darker due to the walnuts. The flavor is nicely walnut-y but not overwhelmingly so; I probably could have increased the amount.
madbaker: (Paul the Samurai)
Second version of the experiment from April (here), using the no-knead bread recipe here. As before, Thing One replaced ~1/2 cup water with approximately the same volume sourdough starter. I tried to make all the other aspects of the doughs as identical as I could (the cast iron pots are slightly different, although similar in size and weight). The base dough was 2 cups whole wheat flour and 2 cups all-purpose white.

As before, Thing One was roughly 100 g heavier. I cut the overnight rise to 16 hours because both seemed to be burbly enough even though it wasn't a really hot day here (unlike the East Bay! Which is part of why we live on this side.) And I made sure the oven was on this time so that there was no problem with over-proving. (I went back to 450 on the temperature.)

Both came out well. Thing Two looked nicer - a domed boule with a slight crack. Thing One rose a bit less and cracked quite a bit more (which probably impacted the rising). But Thing One tasted like a commercial sourdough loaf, with nice crumb and a good sour flavor. Thing Two was... a bit nondescript in comparison. Although maybe that will change when I try eating it on its own.

Thing One was dark on the bottom, almost burnt but nowhere close to the blistering I got the first time I tried the recipe. I think that is due to two factors: the first time I schlorped the dough into the pan while it was in the oven and quickly closed it up, since there was already a pan loaf next to it. Both last time and this time I took the pots out of the oven, placed the loaves in and closed up, and then put them back in. So the bread might have gotten a bit less steam and direct heat. Also, I started using parchment underneath the loaf to make transferring easy - which it does and that keeps the loaves looking much nicer. But I suspect the parchment is also absorbing some of the steam and certainly the direct heat of the pan underneath is slightly filtered.
madbaker: (Paul the Samurai)
Yesterday I made the no-knead bread recipe again, because we basically devoured the loaf over the week. This time I wanted to see how sourdough starter would work in it. So Friday night I made one bowl of regular dough (half wheat, half strong white) and a second the exact same, but with one cup of sourdough starter replacing the water. Well, I had to add a bit more water to get the right texture. I called them Thing One and Thing Two. Thing One was the sourdough.

After the 18 hour rise, Thing One was heavier by ~100g and Thing Two was schlorpier. This made some sense; more mass in the sourdough and more aeration/yeast activity in the dry yeast. I pulled out my 14" Lodge footed pot from the garage (I don't use it anymore for tourney baking, but I can't get rid of it) and started the oven with the two pots. When the timer went off, I checked the oven... to find out that I had apparently not gotten it lit. Sigh. Another half hour and I started the bake. Unfortunately by that point Thing Two was a bit over-proofed, so it was significantly wider and flatter.

Given that last week's single loaf was too hot at 450, I heated the oven to 425. This time the loaves did not get near-burnt. In fact, Thing Two was significantly softer on the underside. Which makes sense, because the 14" Lodge has a cake rack living in it, so the loaf did not touch the bottom of the pot. Apparently I should have let it. Also, with two cast iron pots in the oven, neither one got as hot and so both could have used a higher temp.

Thing One has a significantly tighter crumb, which I expected. It also has more sourdough flavor as expected. Both are good but Thing One looks better because it is rounder. Thing Two has a softer crust (even discounting the underside). I'd like to try the experiment again, but with our two smaller cast iron pots and a longer pre-heat (I might heat to 450 and turn it down after the initial 30 min). But we have to finish these loaves first.
madbaker: (KOL)
We started watching Eureka, a TV series from about 10-15 years ago. The premise is "A U.S. Marshal becomes the sheriff of a remote cozy little Northwestern town of Eureka where the best minds in the US have secretly been tucked away to build futuristic inventions for the government which often go disastrously wrong."

It's not bad. Fluffy, which is good right now. However, my not-so-inner critic exploded at a few things.
  • It's supposedly a half day's drive from LA. Yet it's in the Northwest, somewhere vaguely Oregon-ish. LA scriptwriters apparently have no concept of driving distance outside the LA basin.
  • Poison ivy is not native to this coast.  ETA: maybe the scriptwriters are East coast?  That answers both points.
  • The inventors' focus seems to be primarily on weapons. That's lazy screenwriting. Inventions shown in the first few episodes include such game-changers as a portable fusion generator. That's far more useful to the military than a bulky personal force field (also in the first few episodes)! One, it's enormously valuable commercially and they are supposedly operating through a commercial company that would be jumping all over this to sell. Two, it destabilizes unfriendly despots who are dependent on oil revenues. Three, think of the space you save on warships and submarines and how much longer you can stay out on patrol...

We'll keep watching it, but I reserve the right to yell at the screen.
madbaker: (mammoth garlic)
This is going to be a slightly much longer post than usual for this tag. Because this is Resolution Recipe #800. And round numbers can be an excuse for introspection.

Why Resolution Recipes?
Read more... )

Numbers GeekeryRead more... )

A few other notes. Read more... )

Finally after all that bloviating, this week's Resolution Recipe: Mapo Tofu.
(Fuschia Shock) Read more... )

Bonus: Sweetcorn Kernels with Green Peppers.
"This is the kind of everyday dish you won't often find in recipe books, but it crops up frequently on the menus of low-key Sichuanese restaurants and in home kitchens."
Read more... )

Bonus bonus: Basic Rice... FOR SCIENCE!
Read more... )
Now that I've hit this round number, I have no plans to stop cooking Resolution Recipes. I certainly wouldn't have imagined that I'd still be going this many years later. Now if only I could make and follow some other resolutions with this fidelity...
madbaker: (oxford comma)
We're finishing up iZombie this week. It's been fun overall. However, the last few seasons have failed to acknowledge basic math problems with a zombie horde. Namely, that (as often with vampires) you can't make the numbers work to keep both a growing predatory monster population and a normal human population viable.

By the end of the third season, there are ~15,000 zombies in Seattle and they want to create far more across the US so that they can take over from humans. It's canon that each zombie requires one (presumably mature full-size) brain per week to survive. For one zombie, that's 52 brains per year and 936 over the course of 18 years (to replenish the supply). Let's make the numbers even for ease of calculation and call it 1000, since some brains will be unusable - whether by death trauma or problems that would affect the zombie eating the brain, like Alzheimer's. (That also excludes the many additional brains needed if the zombie has to heal.)

For 15k zombies, that's 15 million brains required over 18 years. But zombies are incredibly fecund: one scratch is all it takes to turn a normal human. Sex also transmits, even with prophylactics. So you can't realistically keep the zombie numbers down.

The 2019 US population is estimated at 329 million. You could support maybe 329k zombies - but only if you control the zombie population strictly; every normal brain is harvested every year; and adults are culled early enough on while still reproducing. And none of that wouldn ever happen. And yet no one on the show ever thinks about the math. Because the writers don't have a good answer for that. If I were a character in the show, I'd be loudly talking about this all the time.

This is what being an active math major is like, apparently.
madbaker: (oxford comma)
It was a busy weekend, even though objectively it wasn't actually hectic.
Read more... )
Pics! )
madbaker: (oxford comma)
Read more... )

Oops.

Aug. 18th, 2019 09:04 am
madbaker: (Giants)
The wife and I decided to get tickets to a Giants game so that we actually go to one this year. Neither of the two alumni groups scheduled one (that I am aware of - it is possible, though unlikely, I have fallen off their lists as I do not donate). I picked a Thursday afternoon game as that will be more fun, even though it means taking some time off work. (Or because.) I bought the tickets.

Then, when I was adding it to the calendar, I noticed that a couple weeks ago I bought tickets to a "history of tamale making in San Francisco" talk that day. Well... the game starts at 12:45, and the talk is at 6. Barring many extra innings we should be okay, but it will be a busy day.

Note to self: this is precisely what calendars are designed to avoid.
madbaker: (Bugs Bunny)
So far today:
Cat yowled and yowled during the early morning. Eventually he threw up. Of course, this was followed by the half-hour grooming session.

A button broke on my work shirt. It's on the cuff, so I didn't bother changing shirts.

Felt I needed a second coffee, so I stopped at my semi-usual place across the street from work. I noticed they have changed bakeries: they now have pains au chocolat labelled correctly. (A "chocolate croissant" is a croissant with chocolate drizzle. It can't be a croissant if it isn't crescent-shaped.)

Got into the office and found that I hadn't seated the coffee lid firmly and it had popped loose. It had spilled a fair amount of coffee on my lunch bag. I hadn't noticed, because it hadn't actually made it on me. So... I guess that's good. The remaining coffee was much cooler than I like though.
madbaker: (oxford comma)
Nothing is "very unique". Something is either unique, or it is not.

Profile

madbaker: (Default)
madbaker

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5 6 78910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 13th, 2025 11:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios