madbaker: (Default)
[personal profile] madbaker
Disclaimer: the positions mentioned here are not necessarily those held by me or my art-school-attending wife.

Point: Art must be judged within its own context.

Counter-point: Just because it's "art" doesn't mean it's not crap.

Discuss.

No answers, just more questions.

Date: 2004-02-02 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] farmount.livejournal.com
To quote [livejournal.com profile] caprine from way back in our college days:

"Art is whatever you can get away with."

I think that what people consider "art" to be a judgment, just as is "good" or "bad." Is a rose good or bad, or is it even considered "art" because it is formed by nature rather than by man? If it is useful, is it then no longer art? Is there no art in a beautifully carved table, or a gorgeous car? How are they different from the Mona Lisa, other than the obvious "one you eat off, one you drive, and one you hang on the wall?" If you hung the table off the wall, would it then become art?

Just my own comments...

Profile

madbaker: (Default)
madbaker

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 8th, 2026 11:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios