Thinking about the play we saw...
Feb. 2nd, 2004 08:29 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
madbakerDisclaimer: the positions mentioned here are not necessarily those held by me or my art-school-attending wife.
Point: Art must be judged within its own context.
Counter-point: Just because it's "art" doesn't mean it's not crap.
Discuss.
Point: Art must be judged within its own context.
Counter-point: Just because it's "art" doesn't mean it's not crap.
Discuss.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 05:38 am (UTC)In general, "art" seems to be something that requires at least some sort of consesus to designate the label. If an insufficient number decide that something is art, then it is indeed crap.
Now, what is the number? 42?